| | | | | | |

Pentium G3260 vs Core i5-9500T


Description
The G3260 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the i5-9500T gets 207.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 3.5 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
906ea
Core
Haswell
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/2
6/6
TDP
53 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
9216 kB
Date
March 2015
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
30.56k points
61.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.89k points
274.02k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3260
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
12.4k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
10.45k
18.41k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
4.69k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
10.48k (x2.74)
TOTAL
30.56k
45.98k (x1.5)

Multithread

G3260

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
74.86k (x3.26)
Test#2 (FP)
20.53k
105.88k (x5.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
22.34k (x2.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
4.01k (x0.61)
TOTAL
58.89k
207.08k (x3.52)

Performance/W
G3260
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
434 points/W
2139 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
387 points/W
3025 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
638 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
114 points/W
TOTAL
1111 points/W
5917 points/W

Performance/GHz
G3260
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3555 points/GHz
3352 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3165 points/GHz
4974 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
1267 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1161 points/GHz
2834 points/GHz
TOTAL
9261 points/GHz
12427 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4