Pentium G3260 vs Core i5-7300U
Description
The G3260 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the i5-7300U gets 82.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300U is 1.4 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the i5-7300U gets 82.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300U is 1.4 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
806e9
Core
Haswell
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
53 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2015
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
30.56k points
48.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.89k points
109.1k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3260
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
9.96k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
10.45k
15.11k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
3.87k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
4.54k (x1.18)
TOTAL
30.56k
33.47k (x1.1)
Multithread
G3260
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
25.26k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
20.53k
40.6k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
11.24k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
5.83k (x0.89)
TOTAL
58.89k
82.94k (x1.41)
Performance/W
G3260
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
434 points/W
1684 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
387 points/W
2707 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
750 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
389 points/W
TOTAL
1111 points/W
5530 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3260
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
3555 points/GHz
2845 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3165 points/GHz
4316 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1161 points/GHz
1296 points/GHz
TOTAL
9261 points/GHz
9563 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4