Pentium G3260 vs Core i5-7200U
Description
The G3260 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the i5-7200U gets 75.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7200U is 1.3 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the i5-7200U gets 75.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7200U is 1.3 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
806e9
Core
Haswell
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
53 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2015
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
30.56k points
44.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.89k points
97.52k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3260
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
11.39k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
10.45k
16.47k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
4.36k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
5.21k (x1.36)
TOTAL
30.56k
37.43k (x1.22)
Multithread
G3260
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
23.57k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
20.53k
37.4k (x1.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
10.15k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
4.78k (x0.73)
TOTAL
58.89k
75.9k (x1.29)
Performance/W
G3260
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
434 points/W
1572 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
387 points/W
2493 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
677 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
319 points/W
TOTAL
1111 points/W
5060 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3260
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3555 points/GHz
3674 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3165 points/GHz
5313 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
1406 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1161 points/GHz
1680 points/GHz
TOTAL
9261 points/GHz
12073 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4