Pentium G3260 vs Core i3-7100
Description
The G3260 is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the i3-7100 gets 94.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 1.6 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the i3-7100 gets 94.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 1.6 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
906e9
Core
Haswell
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
53 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2015
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
30.56k points
57.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.89k points
124.8k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3260
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
14.04k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
10.45k
20.55k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
5.41k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
3.99k (x1.04)
TOTAL
30.56k
43.99k (x1.44)
Multithread
G3260
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
30.09k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
20.53k
47.84k (x2.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
13.13k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
3.52k (x0.54)
TOTAL
58.89k
94.59k (x1.61)
Performance/W
G3260
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
434 points/W
590 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
387 points/W
938 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
69 points/W
TOTAL
1111 points/W
1855 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3260
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
3555 points/GHz
3601 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3165 points/GHz
5268 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
1386 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1161 points/GHz
1024 points/GHz
TOTAL
9261 points/GHz
11279 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4