Pentium G3260 vs Celeron N5105
Description
The G3260 is based on Haswell architecture while the N5105 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 1.1 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 1.1 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
906c0
Core
Haswell
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
53 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2015
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
30.56k points
27.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.89k points
64.09k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3260
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
9.83k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
10.45k
9.74k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
3.65k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
3.88k (x1.01)
TOTAL
30.56k
27.1k (x0.89)
Multithread
G3260
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
25.04k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
20.53k
24.7k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
9.29k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
5.06k (x0.77)
TOTAL
58.89k
64.09k (x1.09)
Performance/W
G3260
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
434 points/W
2504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
387 points/W
2470 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
929 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
506 points/W
TOTAL
1111 points/W
6409 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3260
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
3555 points/GHz
3388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3165 points/GHz
3358 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1161 points/GHz
1338 points/GHz
TOTAL
9261 points/GHz
9344 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4