Pentium G3260 vs Celeron N5095
Description
The G3260 is based on Haswell architecture while the N5095 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.6 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.6 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
906c0
Core
Haswell
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
FCBGA 1338
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
53 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2015
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
30.56k points
26.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.89k points
93.26k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3260
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
10.08k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
10.45k
10.11k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
4.06k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
2.36k (x0.62)
TOTAL
30.56k
26.6k (x0.87)
Multithread
G3260
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
36.86k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
20.53k
38.51k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
15.17k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
2.72k (x0.41)
TOTAL
58.89k
93.26k (x1.58)
Performance/W
G3260
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
434 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
387 points/W
2567 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
1012 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
181 points/W
TOTAL
1111 points/W
6217 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3260
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
3555 points/GHz
3475 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3165 points/GHz
3486 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
1399 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1161 points/GHz
814 points/GHz
TOTAL
9261 points/GHz
9174 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4