Pentium G3260 vs Ryzen 5 3500U
Description
The G3260 is based on Haswell architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the 3500U gets 149.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 2.5 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the 3500U gets 149.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 2.5 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f81
Core
Haswell
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
53 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2015
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
30.56k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.89k points
140.97k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3260
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
11.98k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
10.45k
15.85k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
4.53k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
3.29k (x0.86)
TOTAL
30.56k
35.65k (x1.17)
Multithread
G3260
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
48.28k (x2.1)
Test#2 (FP)
20.53k
74.19k (x3.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
23.29k (x2.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
3.47k (x0.53)
TOTAL
58.89k
149.23k (x2.53)
Performance/W
G3260
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
434 points/W
3219 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
387 points/W
4946 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
1553 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
231 points/W
TOTAL
1111 points/W
9949 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3260
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3555 points/GHz
3238 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3165 points/GHz
4283 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
1224 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1161 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
TOTAL
9261 points/GHz
9634 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4