Pentium G3260 vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The G3260 is based on Haswell architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the 3200G gets 165.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 2.8 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the 3200G gets 165.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 2.8 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f81
Core
Haswell
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
53 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2015
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
30.56k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.89k points
168.69k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3260
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
14.3k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
10.45k
21.69k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
5.42k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
6.6k (x1.72)
TOTAL
30.56k
48k (x1.57)
Multithread
G3260
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
55.45k (x2.41)
Test#2 (FP)
20.53k
83.13k (x4.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
20.76k (x2.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
6.58k (x1)
TOTAL
58.89k
165.91k (x2.82)
Performance/W
G3260
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
434 points/W
853 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
387 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
319 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
1111 points/W
2552 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3260
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3555 points/GHz
3574 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3165 points/GHz
5422 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
1354 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1161 points/GHz
1650 points/GHz
TOTAL
9261 points/GHz
12000 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4