Pentium G2020 vs E6600
Description
The G2020 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E6600 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2020 gets a score of 42.4 k points while the E6600 gets 29.4 k points.
Summarizing, the G2020 is 1.4 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2020 gets a score of 42.4 k points while the E6600 gets 29.4 k points.
Summarizing, the G2020 is 1.4 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
1067a
Core
Ivy Bridge
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.067 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
55 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
January 2013
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
25.87k points
16.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
42.39k points
29.4k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G2020
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
9.9k
3.57k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
9.01k
7.85k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
3.14k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
1.58k (x0.51)
TOTAL
25.87k
16.14k (x0.62)
Multithread
G2020
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
18.83k
6.99k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
14.15k
14.66k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.61k
6.09k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.81k
1.66k (x0.59)
TOTAL
42.39k
29.4k (x0.69)
Performance/W
G2020
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
342 points/W
108 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
257 points/W
226 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
120 points/W
94 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
51 points/W
26 points/W
TOTAL
771 points/W
452 points/W
Performance/GHz
G2020
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
3415 points/GHz
1163 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3107 points/GHz
2561 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
1023 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1065 points/GHz
516 points/GHz
TOTAL
8921 points/GHz
5263 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4