Pentium G2020 vs Xeon X5675
Description
The G2020 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the X5675 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2020 gets a score of 42.4 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 2.9 times faster than the G2020 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2020 gets a score of 42.4 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 2.9 times faster than the G2020 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
206c2
Core
Ivy Bridge
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
6 /12
TDP
55 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2013
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
25.87k points
21.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
42.39k points
124.92k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G2020
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
9.9k
8.77k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
9.01k
5.82k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
3.47k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
2.98k (x0.97)
TOTAL
25.87k
21.04k (x0.81)
Multithread
G2020
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
18.83k
53.23k (x2.83)
Test#2 (FP)
14.15k
39.35k (x2.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.61k
27.05k (x4.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.81k
5.28k (x1.88)
TOTAL
42.39k
124.92k (x2.95)
Performance/W
G2020
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
342 points/W
560 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
257 points/W
414 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
120 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
51 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
771 points/W
1315 points/W
Performance/GHz
G2020
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
3415 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3107 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1065 points/GHz
860 points/GHz
TOTAL
8921 points/GHz
6070 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4