Pentium G2020 vs Xeon E5504
Description
The G2020 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E5504 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2020 gets a score of 42.4 k points while the E5504 gets 42 k points.
Summarizing, the G2020 is 1 times faster than the E5504 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2020 gets a score of 42.4 k points while the E5504 gets 42 k points.
Summarizing, the G2020 is 1 times faster than the E5504 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
106a5
Core
Ivy Bridge
Gainestown
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
4 /4
TDP
55 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2013
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
25.87k points
10.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
42.39k points
41.95k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G2020
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
9.9k
4.57k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
9.01k
3.07k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
1.85k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
1.43k (x0.46)
TOTAL
25.87k
10.92k (x0.42)
Multithread
G2020
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
18.83k
19.07k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
14.15k
12.52k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.61k
7.97k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.81k
2.39k (x0.85)
TOTAL
42.39k
41.95k (x0.99)
Performance/W
G2020
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
342 points/W
238 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
257 points/W
157 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
120 points/W
100 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
51 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
771 points/W
524 points/W
Performance/GHz
G2020
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
3415 points/GHz
2287 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3107 points/GHz
1535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
926 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1065 points/GHz
713 points/GHz
TOTAL
8921 points/GHz
5460 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4