Pentium G2020 vs Core i7-4702MQ
Description
The G2020 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2020 gets a score of 31.1 k points while the i7-4702MQ gets 75.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 2.4 times faster than the G2020 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2020 gets a score of 31.1 k points while the i7-4702MQ gets 75.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 2.4 times faster than the G2020 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
306c3
Core
Ivy Bridge
Haswell
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
Socket G3
Cores/Threads
2/2
4 /8
TDP
55 W
37 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2013
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
25.87k points
36.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
42.39k points
145.15k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G2020
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
2.94k
3.45k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
8.23k
8.53k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.69k
3.99k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.46k
3.51k (x1.42)
TOTAL
17.33k
19.47k (x1.12)
Multithread
G2020
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
5.54k
11.93k (x2.15)
Test#2 (FP)
15.47k
42.4k (x2.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.06k
18k (x2.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.99k
3.6k (x1.2)
TOTAL
31.05k
75.92k (x2.44)
Performance/W
G2020
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
101 points/W
323 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
281 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128 points/W
486 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
54 points/W
97 points/W
TOTAL
565 points/W
2052 points/W
Performance/GHz
G2020
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1015 points/GHz
1078 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2839 points/GHz
2665 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
849 points/GHz
1096 points/GHz
TOTAL
5976 points/GHz
6085 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4