Pentium G2020 vs Celeron N5105
Description
The G2020 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the N5105 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2020 gets a score of 42.4 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 1.5 times faster than the G2020 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2020 gets a score of 42.4 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 1.5 times faster than the G2020 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
906c0
Core
Ivy Bridge
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
55 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2013
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
25.87k points
27.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
42.39k points
64.09k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G2020
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
9.9k
9.83k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
9.01k
9.74k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
3.65k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
3.88k (x1.26)
TOTAL
25.87k
27.1k (x1.05)
Multithread
G2020
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
18.83k
25.04k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
14.15k
24.7k (x1.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.61k
9.29k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.81k
5.06k (x1.8)
TOTAL
42.39k
64.09k (x1.51)
Performance/W
G2020
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
342 points/W
2504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
257 points/W
2470 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
120 points/W
929 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
51 points/W
506 points/W
TOTAL
771 points/W
6409 points/W
Performance/GHz
G2020
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
3415 points/GHz
3388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3107 points/GHz
3358 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1065 points/GHz
1338 points/GHz
TOTAL
8921 points/GHz
9344 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4