| | | | | | |

Pentium G2020 vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The G2020 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2020 gets a score of 42.4 k points while the 2400G gets 183 k points.

Summarizing, the 2400G is 4.3 times faster than the G2020 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
810f10
Core
Ivy Bridge
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
55 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2013
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
25.87k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
42.39k points
198.27k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G2020
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2.94k
3.8k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
8.23k
17.38k (x2.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.69k
5.17k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.46k
3.16k (x1.29)
TOTAL
17.33k
29.52k (x1.7)

Multithread

G2020

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
5.54k
15.28k (x2.76)
Test#2 (FP)
15.47k
76.44k (x4.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.06k
27.48k (x3.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.99k
3.02k (x1.01)
TOTAL
31.05k
122.2k (x3.94)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G2020
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
9.9k
13.95k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
9.01k
20.7k (x2.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
5.33k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
3.03k (x0.98)
TOTAL
25.87k
43.01k (x1.66)

Multithread

G2020

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
18.83k
58.56k (x3.11)
Test#2 (FP)
14.15k
92.95k (x6.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.61k
28.55k (x4.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.81k
2.98k (x1.06)
TOTAL
42.39k
183.04k (x4.32)

Performance/W
G2020
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
342 points/W
901 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
257 points/W
1430 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
120 points/W
439 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
51 points/W
46 points/W
TOTAL
771 points/W
2816 points/W

Performance/GHz
G2020
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3415 points/GHz
3577 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3107 points/GHz
5308 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1065 points/GHz
776 points/GHz
TOTAL
8921 points/GHz
11028 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4