Pentium Gold 5405U vs Xeon E5-2697 v2
Description
The 5405U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5405U gets a score of 48.8 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 617.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 12.7 times faster than the 5405U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5405U gets a score of 48.8 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 617.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 12.7 times faster than the 5405U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806eb
306e4
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/4
12 /24
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
21.34k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.83k points
633.14k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
5405U
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
7.01k
10.64k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
9.51k
9.53k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.31k
4.12k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
3.62k (x1.44)
TOTAL
21.34k
27.91k (x1.31)
Multithread
5405U
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
16.03k
252.69k (x15.76)
Test#2 (FP)
24.11k
238.68k (x9.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.59k
115.5k (x20.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.1k
10.98k (x3.54)
TOTAL
48.83k
617.84k (x12.65)
Performance/W
5405U
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1069 points/W
1944 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1607 points/W
1836 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
372 points/W
888 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
207 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
3255 points/W
4753 points/W
Performance/GHz
5405U
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3046 points/GHz
3041 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4134 points/GHz
2722 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1004 points/GHz
1178 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1094 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
TOTAL
9278 points/GHz
7973 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4