Pentium Gold 5405U vs Celeron N5105
Description
The 5405U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the N5105 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5405U gets a score of 48.8 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 1.3 times faster than the 5405U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5405U gets a score of 48.8 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 1.3 times faster than the 5405U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806eb
906c0
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
21.34k points
27.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.83k points
64.09k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
5405U
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
7.01k
9.83k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
9.51k
9.74k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.31k
3.65k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
3.88k (x1.54)
TOTAL
21.34k
27.1k (x1.27)
Multithread
5405U
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
16.03k
25.04k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
24.11k
24.7k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.59k
9.29k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.1k
5.06k (x1.63)
TOTAL
48.83k
64.09k (x1.31)
Performance/W
5405U
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
1069 points/W
2504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1607 points/W
2470 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
372 points/W
929 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
207 points/W
506 points/W
TOTAL
3255 points/W
6409 points/W
Performance/GHz
5405U
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
3046 points/GHz
3388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4134 points/GHz
3358 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1004 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1094 points/GHz
1338 points/GHz
TOTAL
9278 points/GHz
9344 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4