Pentium Gold 5405U vs Celeron G3900TE
Description
The 5405U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the G3900TE is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5405U gets a score of 48.8 k points while the G3900TE gets 49.3 k points.
Summarizing, the G3900TE is 1 times faster than the 5405U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5405U gets a score of 48.8 k points while the G3900TE gets 49.3 k points.
Summarizing, the G3900TE is 1 times faster than the 5405U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806eb
506e3
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
2048 kB
Date
January 2019
December 2015
Mean monothread perf.
21.34k points
27.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.83k points
49.34k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
5405U
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
7.01k
8.56k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
9.51k
12.25k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.31k
3.17k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
3.35k (x1.33)
TOTAL
21.34k
27.33k (x1.28)
Multithread
5405U
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
16.03k
16.42k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
24.11k
23.61k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.59k
5.75k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.1k
3.55k (x1.14)
TOTAL
48.83k
49.34k (x1.01)
Performance/W
5405U
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
1069 points/W
469 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1607 points/W
675 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
372 points/W
164 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
207 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
3255 points/W
1410 points/W
Performance/GHz
5405U
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
3046 points/GHz
3724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4134 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1004 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1094 points/GHz
1455 points/GHz
TOTAL
9278 points/GHz
11885 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4