| | | | | | |

Pentium Gold 5405U vs Ryzen 5 3500U


Description
The 5405U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5405U gets a score of 48.8 k points while the 3500U gets 149.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 3500U is 3.1 times faster than the 5405U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806eb
810f81
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
21.34k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.83k points
140.97k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
5405U
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.01k
11.98k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
9.51k
15.85k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.31k
4.53k (x1.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
3.29k (x1.31)
TOTAL
21.34k
35.65k (x1.67)

Multithread

5405U

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.03k
48.28k (x3.01)
Test#2 (FP)
24.11k
74.19k (x3.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.59k
23.29k (x4.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.1k
3.47k (x1.12)
TOTAL
48.83k
149.23k (x3.06)

Performance/W
5405U
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
1069 points/W
3219 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1607 points/W
4946 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
372 points/W
1553 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
207 points/W
231 points/W
TOTAL
3255 points/W
9949 points/W

Performance/GHz
5405U
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3046 points/GHz
3238 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4134 points/GHz
4283 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1004 points/GHz
1224 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1094 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
TOTAL
9278 points/GHz
9634 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4