Pentium Gold 5405U vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The 5405U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5405U gets a score of 48.8 k points while the 2400G gets 183 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 3.8 times faster than the 5405U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5405U gets a score of 48.8 k points while the 2400G gets 183 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 3.8 times faster than the 5405U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806eb
810f10
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
21.34k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.83k points
198.27k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
5405U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
7.01k
13.95k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
9.51k
20.7k (x2.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.31k
5.33k (x2.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
3.03k (x1.2)
TOTAL
21.34k
43.01k (x2.02)
Multithread
5405U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
16.03k
58.56k (x3.65)
Test#2 (FP)
24.11k
92.95k (x3.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.59k
28.55k (x5.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.1k
2.98k (x0.96)
TOTAL
48.83k
183.04k (x3.75)
Performance/W
5405U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1069 points/W
901 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1607 points/W
1430 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
372 points/W
439 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
207 points/W
46 points/W
TOTAL
3255 points/W
2816 points/W
Performance/GHz
5405U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3046 points/GHz
3577 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4134 points/GHz
5308 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1004 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1094 points/GHz
776 points/GHz
TOTAL
9278 points/GHz
11028 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4