Pentium Gold 5405U vs Ryzen 3 2200U
Description
The 5405U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5405U gets a score of 48.8 k points while the 2200U gets 64.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.3 times faster than the 5405U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5405U gets a score of 48.8 k points while the 2200U gets 64.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.3 times faster than the 5405U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806eb
810f10
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
21.34k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.83k points
71.02k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
5405U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.01k
11.67k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
9.51k
14.02k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.31k
4.53k (x1.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
2.93k (x1.16)
TOTAL
21.34k
33.14k (x1.55)
Multithread
5405U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.03k
20.49k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
24.11k
31.32k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.59k
9.99k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.1k
3.03k (x0.98)
TOTAL
48.83k
64.82k (x1.33)
Performance/W
5405U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1069 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1607 points/W
2088 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
372 points/W
666 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
207 points/W
202 points/W
TOTAL
3255 points/W
4322 points/W
Performance/GHz
5405U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3046 points/GHz
3433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4134 points/GHz
4123 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1004 points/GHz
1331 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1094 points/GHz
861 points/GHz
TOTAL
9278 points/GHz
9748 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4