Pentium 4417U vs Xeon W3520
Description
The 4417U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the W3520 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4417U gets a score of 41.1 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the W3520 is 1.8 times faster than the 4417U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4417U gets a score of 41.1 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the W3520 is 1.8 times faster than the 4417U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
106a5
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Nehalem-WS
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.933 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
4 /8
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
24.49k points
17.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.15k points
73.16k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4417U
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
7.94k
7.35k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
11.35k
4.89k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.39k
2.9k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
2.82k (x1.01)
TOTAL
24.49k
17.96k (x0.73)
Multithread
4417U
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
29.69k (x2.27)
Test#2 (FP)
21.1k
22.26k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.49k
14.91k (x3.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.46k
6.29k (x2.56)
TOTAL
41.15k
73.16k (x1.78)
Performance/W
4417U
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
873 points/W
228 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1407 points/W
171 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
115 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
164 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
2743 points/W
563 points/W
Performance/GHz
4417U
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
3452 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4937 points/GHz
1669 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1041 points/GHz
989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1217 points/GHz
960 points/GHz
TOTAL
10646 points/GHz
6123 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4