| | | | | | |

Pentium 4417U vs Xeon E5-2680 v2


Description
The 4417U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4417U gets a score of 41.1 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 537 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 13.1 times faster than the 4417U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
306e4
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/4
10 /20
TDP
15 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
25600 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
24.49k points
28.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.15k points
551.1k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4417U
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
7.94k
11.96k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
11.35k
10.73k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.39k
4.59k (x1.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
4.31k (x1.54)
TOTAL
24.49k
31.6k (x1.29)

Multithread

4417U

E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
218.24k (x16.66)
Test#2 (FP)
21.1k
206.92k (x9.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.49k
100.37k (x22.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.46k
11.45k (x4.65)
TOTAL
41.15k
536.99k (x13.05)

Performance/W
4417U
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
873 points/W
1898 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1407 points/W
1799 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
873 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
164 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
2743 points/W
4669 points/W

Performance/GHz
4417U
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3452 points/GHz
3323 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4937 points/GHz
2982 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1041 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1217 points/GHz
1197 points/GHz
TOTAL
10646 points/GHz
8777 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4