Pentium 4417U vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The 4417U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4417U gets a score of 41.1 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 182.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 4.4 times faster than the 4417U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4417U gets a score of 41.1 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 182.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 4.4 times faster than the 4417U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
406f1
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2019
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
24.49k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.15k points
237.83k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4417U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
7.94k
8.22k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
11.35k
12.06k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.39k
4.01k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
2.89k (x1.03)
TOTAL
24.49k
27.18k (x1.11)
Multithread
4417U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
61.34k (x4.68)
Test#2 (FP)
21.1k
90.21k (x4.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.49k
26.2k (x5.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.46k
4.62k (x1.88)
TOTAL
41.15k
182.37k (x4.43)
Performance/W
4417U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
873 points/W
722 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1407 points/W
1061 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
164 points/W
54 points/W
TOTAL
2743 points/W
2146 points/W
Performance/GHz
4417U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3452 points/GHz
2739 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4937 points/GHz
4021 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1041 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1217 points/GHz
963 points/GHz
TOTAL
10646 points/GHz
9059 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4