Pentium 4417U vs T3400
Description
The 4417U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the T3400 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4417U gets a score of 41.1 k points while the T3400 gets 14.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 4417U is 2.8 times faster than the T3400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4417U gets a score of 41.1 k points while the T3400 gets 14.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 4417U is 2.8 times faster than the T3400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
6fd
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Merom-2M
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.167 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
Socket P
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
kB
Date
January 2019
October 2008
Mean monothread perf.
24.49k points
8.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.15k points
14.91k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4417U
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
7.94k
2.49k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
11.35k
2.25k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.39k
2.17k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
1.14k (x0.41)
TOTAL
24.49k
8.05k (x0.33)
Multithread
4417U
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
4.98k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
21.1k
4.43k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.49k
4.27k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.46k
1.23k (x0.5)
TOTAL
41.15k
14.91k (x0.36)
Performance/W
4417U
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
873 points/W
142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1407 points/W
127 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
122 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
164 points/W
35 points/W
TOTAL
2743 points/W
426 points/W
Performance/GHz
4417U
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
3452 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4937 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1041 points/GHz
1002 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1217 points/GHz
526 points/GHz
TOTAL
10646 points/GHz
3714 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4