Pentium 4417U vs 4415U
Description
Both models 4417U and 4415U are based on Kaby Lake architecture.
The first Kaby Lake CPU was released in August 2016. It uses a 14 nm process and was the first architecture in breaking the previous tick-tock model. Actually, it is not that different from the preceding Skylake: it has 64kB of L1 cache and 256kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4417U gets a score of 41.1 k points while the 4415U gets 56.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 4415U is 1.4 times faster than the 4417U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
The first Kaby Lake CPU was released in August 2016. It uses a 14 nm process and was the first architecture in breaking the previous tick-tock model. Actually, it is not that different from the preceding Skylake: it has 64kB of L1 cache and 256kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4417U gets a score of 41.1 k points while the 4415U gets 56.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 4415U is 1.4 times faster than the 4417U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
806e9
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
2048 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
24.49k points
27.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.15k points
56.39k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4417U
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.94k
8.29k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
11.35k
11.82k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.39k
3.09k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
4.18k (x1.5)
TOTAL
24.49k
27.39k (x1.12)
Multithread
4417U
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
17.24k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
21.1k
27.4k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.49k
7.44k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.46k
4.31k (x1.75)
TOTAL
41.15k
56.39k (x1.37)
Performance/W
4417U
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
873 points/W
1149 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1407 points/W
1827 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
496 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
164 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
2743 points/W
3759 points/W
Performance/GHz
4417U
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
3452 points/GHz
3605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4937 points/GHz
5140 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1041 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1217 points/GHz
1819 points/GHz
TOTAL
10646 points/GHz
11908 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4