Pentium 4417U vs Core 2 Quad Q6600
Description
The 4417U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the Q6600 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4417U gets a score of 41.1 k points while the Q6600 gets 30.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4417U is 1.3 times faster than the Q6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4417U gets a score of 41.1 k points while the Q6600 gets 30.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4417U is 1.3 times faster than the Q6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
6fb
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Kentsfield
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8192 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
kB
Date
January 2019
July 2007
Mean monothread perf.
24.49k points
8.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.15k points
30.64k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4417U
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
7.94k
2.78k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
11.35k
2.49k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.39k
2.37k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
1.29k (x0.46)
TOTAL
24.49k
8.92k (x0.36)
Multithread
4417U
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
10.9k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
21.1k
9.79k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.49k
9.11k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.46k
0.84k (x0.34)
TOTAL
41.15k
30.64k (x0.74)
Performance/W
4417U
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
873 points/W
115 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1407 points/W
103 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
96 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
164 points/W
9 points/W
TOTAL
2743 points/W
323 points/W
Performance/GHz
4417U
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
3452 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4937 points/GHz
1036 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1041 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1217 points/GHz
539 points/GHz
TOTAL
10646 points/GHz
3718 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4