Pentium 4417U vs Core i7-920
Description
The 4417U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-920 is based on Nehalem Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4417U gets a score of 41.1 k points while the i7-920 gets 47.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-920 is 1.1 times faster than the 4417U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4417U gets a score of 41.1 k points while the i7-920 gets 47.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-920 is 1.1 times faster than the 4417U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
106a5
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.993 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
November 2008
Mean monothread perf.
24.49k points
16.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.15k points
47.2k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4417U
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
7.94k
6.12k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
11.35k
4.76k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.39k
2.78k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
2.67k (x0.95)
TOTAL
24.49k
16.33k (x0.67)
Multithread
4417U
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
19.26k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
21.1k
14.96k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.49k
8.05k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.46k
4.92k (x2)
TOTAL
41.15k
47.2k (x1.15)
Performance/W
4417U
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
873 points/W
148 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1407 points/W
115 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
62 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
164 points/W
38 points/W
TOTAL
2743 points/W
363 points/W
Performance/GHz
4417U
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
3452 points/GHz
2044 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4937 points/GHz
1591 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1041 points/GHz
930 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1217 points/GHz
891 points/GHz
TOTAL
10646 points/GHz
5457 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4