| | | | | | |

Pentium 4417U vs Core i5-3210M


Description
The 4417U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-3210M is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4417U gets a score of 41.1 k points while the i5-3210M gets 53.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3210M is 1.3 times faster than the 4417U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
306a9
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
2/4
2 /2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2019
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
24.49k points
24.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.15k points
51.73k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4417U
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
7.94k
8.59k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
11.35k
8.88k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.39k
3.59k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
3.45k (x1.23)
TOTAL
24.49k
24.51k (x1)

Multithread

4417U

i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
20.18k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
21.1k
19.96k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.49k
8.93k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.46k
4.6k (x1.87)
TOTAL
41.15k
53.67k (x1.3)

Performance/W
4417U
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
873 points/W
577 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1407 points/W
570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
255 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
164 points/W
131 points/W
TOTAL
2743 points/W
1533 points/W

Performance/GHz
4417U
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
3452 points/GHz
2772 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4937 points/GHz
2864 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1041 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1217 points/GHz
1114 points/GHz
TOTAL
10646 points/GHz
7908 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4