Pentium 4417U vs Core i5-10400T
Description
The 4417U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4417U gets a score of 41.1 k points while the i5-10400T gets 229.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 5.6 times faster than the 4417U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4417U gets a score of 41.1 k points while the i5-10400T gets 229.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 5.6 times faster than the 4417U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
a0653
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
24.49k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.15k points
307.18k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4417U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.94k
12.61k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
11.35k
17.94k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.39k
4.83k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
10.81k (x3.86)
TOTAL
24.49k
46.19k (x1.89)
Multithread
4417U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
74.62k (x5.7)
Test#2 (FP)
21.1k
119.63k (x5.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.49k
32.65k (x7.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.46k
2.52k (x1.02)
TOTAL
41.15k
229.42k (x5.58)
Performance/W
4417U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
873 points/W
2132 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1407 points/W
3418 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
933 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
164 points/W
72 points/W
TOTAL
2743 points/W
6555 points/W
Performance/GHz
4417U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3452 points/GHz
3503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4937 points/GHz
4984 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1041 points/GHz
1341 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1217 points/GHz
3003 points/GHz
TOTAL
10646 points/GHz
12831 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4