Pentium 4417U vs A9 9420
Description
The 4417U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 9420 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4417U gets a score of 41.1 k points while the 9420 gets 28.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 4417U is 1.4 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4417U gets a score of 41.1 k points while the 9420 gets 28.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 4417U is 1.4 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
670f00
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
Micro-BGA
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
24.49k points
33.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.15k points
46.33k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4417U
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
7.94k
8.41k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
11.35k
11.48k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.39k
3.29k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
2.24k (x0.8)
TOTAL
24.49k
25.41k (x1.04)
Multithread
4417U
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
11.25k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
21.1k
13.69k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.49k
2.09k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.46k
1.87k (x0.76)
TOTAL
41.15k
28.89k (x0.7)
Performance/W
4417U
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
873 points/W
750 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1407 points/W
912 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
139 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
164 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
2743 points/W
1926 points/W
Performance/GHz
4417U
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
3452 points/GHz
2336 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4937 points/GHz
3188 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1041 points/GHz
913 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1217 points/GHz
621 points/GHz
TOTAL
10646 points/GHz
7058 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4