| | | | | | |

Pentium 4417U vs A6 9210


Description
The 4417U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4417U gets a score of 41.1 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 4417U is 1.6 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
670f00
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Stoney Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2019
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
24.49k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.15k points
27.13k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4417U
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
7.94k
4.87k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
11.35k
10.38k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.39k
2.59k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
2.38k (x0.85)
TOTAL
24.49k
20.22k (x0.83)

Multithread

4417U

9210
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
7.41k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
21.1k
11.87k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.49k
3.35k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.46k
2.6k (x1.06)
TOTAL
41.15k
25.23k (x0.61)

Performance/W
4417U
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
873 points/W
494 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1407 points/W
792 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
164 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
2743 points/W
1682 points/W

Performance/GHz
4417U
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
3452 points/GHz
1740 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4937 points/GHz
3707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1041 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1217 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
10646 points/GHz
7222 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4