| | | | | | |

Pentium 4415U vs Xeon E5506


Description
The 4415U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E5506 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4415U gets a score of 56.4 k points while the E5506 gets 90.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E5506 is 1.6 times faster than the 4415U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
106a5
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Gainestown
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.133 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
4 /4
TDP
15 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
27.39k points
9.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
56.39k points
90.45k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4415U
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
1.21k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
9.51k
2.75k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.05k
1.94k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
0.78k (x0.3)
TOTAL
17.49k
6.68k (x0.38)

Multithread

4415U

E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
4.71k
12.25k (x2.6)
Test#2 (FP)
21.73k
25.55k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.35k
17.1k (x2.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
5.01k (x2.06)
TOTAL
36.22k
59.9k (x1.65)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4415U
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
8.29k
4.48k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
2.99k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.09k
1.81k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.18k
0.69k (x0.17)
TOTAL
27.39k
9.97k (x0.36)

Multithread

4415U

E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
17.24k
41k (x2.38)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
28.17k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.44k
17.4k (x2.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
3.88k (x0.9)
TOTAL
56.39k
90.45k (x1.6)

Performance/W
4415U
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
1149 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1827 points/W
352 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
496 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
287 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
3759 points/W
1131 points/W

Performance/GHz
4415U
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
3605 points/GHz
2099 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5140 points/GHz
1404 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1344 points/GHz
847 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1819 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
11908 points/GHz
4675 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4