| | | | | | |

Pentium 4415U vs Xeon E5472


Description
The 4415U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E5472 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4415U gets a score of 56.4 k points while the E5472 gets 48.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 4415U is 1.2 times faster than the E5472. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
10676
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Harpertown
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA-771
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x6144 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
kB
Date
January 2017
November 2007
Mean monothread perf.
27.39k points
16.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
56.39k points
48.62k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4415U
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
2.29k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
9.51k
5.85k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.05k
2.44k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
4.81k (x1.86)
TOTAL
17.49k
15.39k (x0.88)

Multithread

4415U

E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
4.71k
9.06k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
21.73k
23.09k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.35k
9.7k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
2.53k (x1.04)
TOTAL
36.22k
44.38k (x1.23)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4415U
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
8.29k
2.88k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
6.36k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.09k
2.55k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.18k
4.83k (x1.15)
TOTAL
27.39k
16.62k (x0.61)

Multithread

4415U

E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
17.24k
11.19k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
24.85k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.44k
10.04k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
2.54k (x0.59)
TOTAL
56.39k
48.62k (x0.86)

Performance/W
4415U
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
1149 points/W
140 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1827 points/W
311 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
496 points/W
125 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
287 points/W
32 points/W
TOTAL
3759 points/W
608 points/W

Performance/GHz
4415U
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
3605 points/GHz
961 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5140 points/GHz
2119 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1344 points/GHz
850 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1819 points/GHz
1610 points/GHz
TOTAL
11908 points/GHz
5539 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4