Pentium 4415U vs Core i7-5820K
Description
The 4415U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-5820K is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4415U gets a score of 36.2 k points while the i7-5820K gets 117.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5820K is 3.2 times faster than the 4415U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4415U gets a score of 36.2 k points while the i7-5820K gets 117.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5820K is 3.2 times faster than the 4415U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
306f2
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Haswell-E
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
15360 kB
Date
January 2017
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
27.39k points
31.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
56.39k points
129.06k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4415U
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
3.82k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
9.51k
9.64k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.05k
4.29k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
3.78k (x1.46)
TOTAL
17.49k
21.53k (x1.23)
Multithread
4415U
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.71k
18.07k (x3.84)
Test#2 (FP)
21.73k
64.25k (x2.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.35k
27.03k (x3.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
8.03k (x3.3)
TOTAL
36.22k
117.38k (x3.24)
Performance/W
4415U
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
129 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1449 points/W
459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
490 points/W
193 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
2415 points/W
838 points/W
Performance/GHz
4415U
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
1017 points/GHz
1062 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4136 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1326 points/GHz
1191 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1124 points/GHz
1050 points/GHz
TOTAL
7603 points/GHz
5981 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4