Pentium 4415U vs Core i5-5200U
Description
The 4415U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-5200U is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4415U gets a score of 36.2 k points while the i5-5200U gets 32.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4415U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4415U gets a score of 36.2 k points while the i5-5200U gets 32.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4415U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
306d4
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Broadwell-U
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2 /4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2017
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
27.39k points
31.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
56.39k points
68.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4415U
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
2.67k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
9.51k
9.37k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.05k
3.13k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
2.59k (x1)
TOTAL
17.49k
17.76k (x1.02)
Multithread
4415U
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.71k
4.16k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
21.73k
19.01k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.35k
6.48k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
2.96k (x1.22)
TOTAL
36.22k
32.61k (x0.9)
Performance/W
4415U
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
277 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1449 points/W
1268 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
490 points/W
432 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
197 points/W
TOTAL
2415 points/W
2174 points/W
Performance/GHz
4415U
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1017 points/GHz
988 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4136 points/GHz
3469 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1326 points/GHz
1160 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1124 points/GHz
961 points/GHz
TOTAL
7603 points/GHz
6577 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4