| | | | | | |

Pentium 4415U vs Core i5-3337U


Description
The 4415U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-3337U is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4415U gets a score of 36.2 k points while the i5-3337U gets 31.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 4415U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-3337U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
306a9
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2/4
2 /2
TDP
15 W
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
27.39k points
23.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
56.39k points
48.3k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4415U
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
2.55k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
9.51k
7.24k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.05k
3.26k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
3.37k (x1.3)
TOTAL
17.49k
16.42k (x0.94)

Multithread

4415U

i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.71k
5.03k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
21.73k
14.79k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.35k
7.37k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
4.53k (x1.86)
TOTAL
36.22k
31.72k (x0.88)

Performance/W
4415U
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
296 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1449 points/W
870 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
490 points/W
434 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
267 points/W
TOTAL
2415 points/W
1866 points/W

Performance/GHz
4415U
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
1017 points/GHz
944 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4136 points/GHz
2682 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1326 points/GHz
1206 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1124 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
TOTAL
7603 points/GHz
6080 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4