Pentium 4415U vs Celeron G1610T
Description
The 4415U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4415U gets a score of 56.4 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4415U is 1.5 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4415U gets a score of 56.4 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4415U is 1.5 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
306a9
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
2048 kB
Date
January 2017
December 2012
Mean monothread perf.
27.39k points
20.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
56.39k points
38.59k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4415U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
2.34k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
9.51k
6.54k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.05k
3k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
2.74k (x1.06)
TOTAL
17.49k
14.62k (x0.84)
Multithread
4415U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.71k
4.67k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
21.73k
12.66k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.35k
5.95k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
2.53k (x1.04)
TOTAL
36.22k
25.8k (x0.71)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4415U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
8.29k
7.87k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
7.14k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.09k
3.04k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.18k
2.79k (x0.67)
TOTAL
27.39k
20.84k (x0.76)
Multithread
4415U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
17.24k
15.12k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
14.05k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.44k
5.94k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
3.48k (x0.81)
TOTAL
56.39k
38.59k (x0.68)
Performance/W
4415U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
1149 points/W
432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1827 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
496 points/W
170 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
287 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
3759 points/W
1103 points/W
Performance/GHz
4415U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
3605 points/GHz
3423 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5140 points/GHz
3102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1344 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1819 points/GHz
1211 points/GHz
TOTAL
11908 points/GHz
9060 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4