| | | | | | |

Pentium 4415U vs Ryzen 3 2200U


Description
The 4415U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4415U gets a score of 56.4 k points while the 2200U gets 64.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.1 times faster than the 4415U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
810f10
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
27.39k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
56.39k points
71.02k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4415U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
2.63k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
9.51k
7.84k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.05k
3.63k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
2.93k (x1.13)
TOTAL
17.49k
17.02k (x0.97)

Multithread

4415U

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.71k
5.77k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
21.73k
24.15k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.35k
9.28k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
2.83k (x1.16)
TOTAL
36.22k
42.02k (x1.16)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4415U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.29k
11.67k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
14.02k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.09k
4.53k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.18k
2.93k (x0.7)
TOTAL
27.39k
33.14k (x1.21)

Multithread

4415U

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.24k
20.49k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
31.32k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.44k
9.99k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
3.03k (x0.7)
TOTAL
56.39k
64.82k (x1.15)

Performance/W
4415U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1149 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1827 points/W
2088 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
496 points/W
666 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
287 points/W
202 points/W
TOTAL
3759 points/W
4322 points/W

Performance/GHz
4415U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3605 points/GHz
3433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5140 points/GHz
4123 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1344 points/GHz
1331 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1819 points/GHz
861 points/GHz
TOTAL
11908 points/GHz
9748 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4