| | | | | | |

Pentium 4405U vs Xeon E5-2620 v4


Description
The 4405U is based on Skylake architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4405U gets a score of 51.1 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 182.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 3.6 times faster than the 4405U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
406f1
Core
Skylake-U
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.1 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
20480 kB
Date
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
23.33k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
51.1k points
237.83k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4405U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
7.45k
8.22k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
10.51k
12.06k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.78k
4.01k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
2.89k (x1.12)
TOTAL
23.33k
27.18k (x1.16)

Multithread

4405U

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
16.1k
61.34k (x3.81)
Test#2 (FP)
25.44k
90.21k (x3.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.99k
26.2k (x3.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.58k
4.62k (x1.79)
TOTAL
51.1k
182.37k (x3.57)

Performance/W
4405U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1073 points/W
722 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1696 points/W
1061 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
466 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
54 points/W
TOTAL
3407 points/W
2146 points/W

Performance/GHz
4405U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3547 points/GHz
2739 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5007 points/GHz
4021 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1324 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1232 points/GHz
963 points/GHz
TOTAL
11109 points/GHz
9059 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4