Pentium 4405U vs Core i5-3210M
Description
The 4405U is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-3210M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4405U gets a score of 51.1 k points while the i5-3210M gets 53.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3210M is 1.1 times faster than the 4405U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4405U gets a score of 51.1 k points while the i5-3210M gets 53.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3210M is 1.1 times faster than the 4405U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
306a9
Core
Skylake-U
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
2/4
2 /2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
23.33k points
24.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
51.1k points
51.73k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4405U
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
7.45k
8.59k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
10.51k
8.88k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.78k
3.59k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
3.45k (x1.34)
TOTAL
23.33k
24.51k (x1.05)
Multithread
4405U
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
16.1k
20.18k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
25.44k
19.96k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.99k
8.93k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.58k
4.6k (x1.78)
TOTAL
51.1k
53.67k (x1.05)
Performance/W
4405U
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
1073 points/W
577 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1696 points/W
570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
466 points/W
255 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
131 points/W
TOTAL
3407 points/W
1533 points/W
Performance/GHz
4405U
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
3547 points/GHz
2772 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5007 points/GHz
2864 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1324 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1232 points/GHz
1114 points/GHz
TOTAL
11109 points/GHz
7908 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4