| | | | | | |

Pentium 4405U vs Core i5-10400T


Description
The 4405U is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4405U gets a score of 51.1 k points while the i5-10400T gets 229.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 4.5 times faster than the 4405U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
a0653
Core
Skylake-U
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
23.33k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
51.1k points
307.18k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4405U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.45k
12.61k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
10.51k
17.94k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.78k
4.83k (x1.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
10.81k (x4.18)
TOTAL
23.33k
46.19k (x1.98)

Multithread

4405U

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.1k
74.62k (x4.64)
Test#2 (FP)
25.44k
119.63k (x4.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.99k
32.65k (x4.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.58k
2.52k (x0.98)
TOTAL
51.1k
229.42k (x4.49)

Performance/W
4405U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1073 points/W
2132 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1696 points/W
3418 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
466 points/W
933 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
72 points/W
TOTAL
3407 points/W
6555 points/W

Performance/GHz
4405U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3547 points/GHz
3503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5007 points/GHz
4984 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1324 points/GHz
1341 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1232 points/GHz
3003 points/GHz
TOTAL
11109 points/GHz
12831 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4