Pentium 4 HT 630 vs Pentium T3400
Description
The 630 is based on NetBurst architecture while the T3400 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 630 gets a score of 9.1 k points while the T3400 gets 14.9 k points.
Summarizing, the T3400 is 1.6 times faster than the 630. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 630 gets a score of 9.1 k points while the T3400 gets 14.9 k points.
Summarizing, the T3400 is 1.6 times faster than the 630. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f43
6fd
Core
Prescott
Merom-2M
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.167 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket P
Cores/Threads
1/2
2/2
TDP
84 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+8 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
2005
October 2008
Mean monothread perf.
7.92k points
8.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
9.14k points
14.91k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
630
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
1.56k
1.86k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
2.78k
1.9k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.34k
1.42k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.92k
0.84k (x0.91)
TOTAL
6.6k
6.01k (x0.91)
Multithread
630
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
1.27k
4.04k (x3.18)
Test#2 (FP)
3.26k
4.17k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.58k
3.55k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
1.2k (x1.34)
TOTAL
7.01k
12.96k (x1.85)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
630
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
2.1k
2.49k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
3.33k
2.25k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.58k
2.17k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
1.14k (x1.25)
TOTAL
7.92k
8.05k (x1.02)
Multithread
630
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
1.85k
4.98k (x2.7)
Test#2 (FP)
4.47k
4.43k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
4.27k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
1.23k (x1.36)
TOTAL
9.14k
14.91k (x1.63)
Performance/W
630
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
22 points/W
142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
53 points/W
127 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23 points/W
122 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
11 points/W
35 points/W
TOTAL
109 points/W
426 points/W
Performance/GHz
630
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
699 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
527 points/GHz
1002 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
305 points/GHz
526 points/GHz
TOTAL
2640 points/GHz
3714 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4