Pentium 4 HT 630 vs Celeron N3450
Description
The 630 is based on NetBurst architecture while the N3450 is based on Goldmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 630 gets a score of 9.1 k points while the N3450 gets 39.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N3450 is 4.3 times faster than the 630. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 630 gets a score of 9.1 k points while the N3450 gets 39.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N3450 is 4.3 times faster than the 630. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f43
506c9
Core
Prescott
Apollo Lake
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA1296
Cores/Threads
1/2
4/4
TDP
84 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+8 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
2005
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
7.92k points
13.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
9.14k points
39.33k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
630
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
1.56k
1.54k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
2.78k
2.86k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.34k
1.88k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.92k
1.78k (x1.94)
TOTAL
6.6k
8.06k (x1.22)
Multithread
630
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
1.27k
5.91k (x4.65)
Test#2 (FP)
3.26k
8.55k (x2.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.58k
5.48k (x3.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
2.98k (x3.31)
TOTAL
7.01k
22.92k (x3.27)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
630
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
2.1k
5.95k (x2.84)
Test#2 (FP)
3.33k
3.45k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.58k
1.92k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
1.78k (x1.95)
TOTAL
7.92k
13.11k (x1.66)
Multithread
630
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
1.85k
21.38k (x11.58)
Test#2 (FP)
4.47k
9.84k (x2.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
5.25k (x2.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
2.86k (x3.18)
TOTAL
9.14k
39.33k (x4.31)
Performance/W
630
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
22 points/W
3564 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
53 points/W
1640 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23 points/W
875 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
11 points/W
477 points/W
TOTAL
109 points/W
6555 points/W
Performance/GHz
630
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
699 points/GHz
2706 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/GHz
1570 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
527 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
305 points/GHz
810 points/GHz
TOTAL
2640 points/GHz
5959 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4