| | | | | | |

Pentium 4 HT 630 vs Celeron N3060


Description
The 630 is based on NetBurst architecture while the N3060 is based on Airmont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 630 gets a score of 9.1 k points while the N3060 gets 13.4 k points.

Summarizing, the N3060 is 1.5 times faster than the 630. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
f43
406c4
Core
Prescott
Braswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
2.48 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
1/2
2/2
TDP
84 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+8 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x1024 kB
Date
2005
January 2016
Mean monothread perf.
7.92k points
10.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
9.14k points
13.36k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
630
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
2.1k
4.68k (x2.23)
Test#2 (FP)
3.33k
2.74k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.58k
1.83k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
0.9k (x0.99)
TOTAL
7.92k
10.15k (x1.28)

Multithread

630

N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
1.85k
6.31k (x3.42)
Test#2 (FP)
4.47k
3.68k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
2.46k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
0.91k (x1.01)
TOTAL
9.14k
13.36k (x1.46)

Performance/W
630
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
22 points/W
1051 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
53 points/W
614 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23 points/W
410 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
11 points/W
152 points/W
TOTAL
109 points/W
2227 points/W

Performance/GHz
630
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
699 points/GHz
1885 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/GHz
1104 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
527 points/GHz
739 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
305 points/GHz
364 points/GHz
TOTAL
2640 points/GHz
4092 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4