Pentium 4 HT 630 vs Celeron N2840
Description
The 630 is based on NetBurst architecture while the N2840 is based on Silvermont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 630 gets a score of 9.1 k points while the N2840 gets 16.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N2840 is 1.8 times faster than the 630. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 630 gets a score of 9.1 k points while the N2840 gets 16.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N2840 is 1.8 times faster than the 630. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f43
30678
Core
Prescott
Bay Trail-M
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
2.58 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
1/2
2/2
TDP
84 W
7,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+8 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
1024 kB
Date
2005
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
7.92k points
10.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
9.14k points
16.79k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
630
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
2.1k
4.8k (x2.29)
Test#2 (FP)
3.33k
2.47k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.58k
1.86k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
1.22k (x1.33)
TOTAL
7.92k
10.36k (x1.31)
Multithread
630
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
1.85k
8.24k (x4.46)
Test#2 (FP)
4.47k
4.19k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
3.05k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
1.32k (x1.46)
TOTAL
9.14k
16.79k (x1.84)
Performance/W
630
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
22 points/W
1177 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
53 points/W
598 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23 points/W
436 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
11 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
109 points/W
2399 points/W
Performance/GHz
630
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
699 points/GHz
1861 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/GHz
958 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
527 points/GHz
723 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
305 points/GHz
472 points/GHz
TOTAL
2640 points/GHz
4015 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4