Pentium 4 HT 630 vs Celeron E3300
Description
The 630 is based on NetBurst architecture while the E3300 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 630 gets a score of 9.1 k points while the E3300 gets 24.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E3300 is 2.7 times faster than the 630. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 630 gets a score of 9.1 k points while the E3300 gets 24.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E3300 is 2.7 times faster than the 630. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f43
1067a
Core
Prescott
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
1/2
2/2
TDP
84 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+8 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
1024 kB
Date
2005
August 2009
Mean monothread perf.
7.92k points
12.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
9.14k points
24.6k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
630
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
1.56k
2.29k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
2.78k
5.87k (x2.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.34k
2.49k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.92k
1.01k (x1.1)
TOTAL
6.6k
11.66k (x1.76)
Multithread
630
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
1.27k
4.57k (x3.6)
Test#2 (FP)
3.26k
11.66k (x3.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.58k
4.89k (x3.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
1.04k (x1.15)
TOTAL
7.01k
22.16k (x3.16)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
630
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
2.1k
2.9k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
3.33k
6.38k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.58k
2.59k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
1.08k (x1.18)
TOTAL
7.92k
12.94k (x1.63)
Multithread
630
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
1.85k
5.76k (x3.12)
Test#2 (FP)
4.47k
12.67k (x2.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
5.16k (x2.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
1.01k (x1.13)
TOTAL
9.14k
24.6k (x2.69)
Performance/W
630
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
22 points/W
89 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
53 points/W
195 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23 points/W
79 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
11 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
109 points/W
378 points/W
Performance/GHz
630
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
699 points/GHz
1159 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/GHz
2551 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
527 points/GHz
1034 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
305 points/GHz
431 points/GHz
TOTAL
2640 points/GHz
5175 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4