Pentium 4 HT 531 vs Celeron N3060
Description
The 531 is based on NetBurst architecture while the N3060 is based on Airmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 531 gets a score of 8.9 k points while the N3060 gets 13.4 k points.
Summarizing, the N3060 is 1.5 times faster than the 531. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 531 gets a score of 8.9 k points while the N3060 gets 13.4 k points.
Summarizing, the N3060 is 1.5 times faster than the 531. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f41
406c4
Core
Prescott
Braswell
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
2.48 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
1/2
2/2
TDP
84 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8+8 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x1024 kB
Date
2004
January 2016
Mean monothread perf.
7.95k points
10.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
8.95k points
13.36k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
531
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
2.1k
4.68k (x2.22)
Test#2 (FP)
3.33k
2.74k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.6k
1.83k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
0.9k (x0.99)
TOTAL
7.95k
10.15k (x1.28)
Multithread
531
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
1.89k
6.31k (x3.33)
Test#2 (FP)
4.23k
3.68k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.93k
2.46k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.89k
0.91k (x1.02)
TOTAL
8.95k
13.36k (x1.49)
Performance/W
531
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
23 points/W
1051 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
50 points/W
614 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23 points/W
410 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
11 points/W
152 points/W
TOTAL
106 points/W
2227 points/W
Performance/GHz
531
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
701 points/GHz
1885 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1111 points/GHz
1104 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
534 points/GHz
739 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
305 points/GHz
364 points/GHz
TOTAL
2650 points/GHz
4092 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4