| | | | | | |

Pentium 4 HT 520 vs Pentium E5500


Description
The 520 is based on NetBurst architecture while the E5500 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 520 gets a score of 6.5 k points while the E5500 gets 20.7 k points.

Summarizing, the E5500 is 3.2 times faster than the 520. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
f34
1067a
Core
Prescott
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
1/2
2/2
TDP
84 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8+8 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2048 kB
Date
2004
April 2010
Mean monothread perf.
7.46k points
12.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
8.63k points
20.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
520
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
1.46k
2.56k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
2.6k
6.54k (x2.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.26k
2.76k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.88k
0.91k (x1.04)
TOTAL
6.19k
12.77k (x2.06)

Multithread

520

E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
1.19k
4.32k (x3.63)
Test#2 (FP)
3k
10.8k (x3.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.46k
4.7k (x3.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.89k
0.87k (x0.98)
TOTAL
6.54k
20.69k (x3.16)

Performance/W
520
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
14 points/W
66 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
36 points/W
166 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17 points/W
72 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
11 points/W
13 points/W
TOTAL
78 points/W
318 points/W

Performance/GHz
520
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
521 points/GHz
914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
928 points/GHz
2335 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
450 points/GHz
985 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
314 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
2212 points/GHz
4560 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4