| | | | | | |

Pentium 4 HT 520 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2160


Description
The 520 is based on NetBurst architecture while the E2160 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 520 gets a score of 8.6 k points while the E2160 gets 12.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E2160 is 1.5 times faster than the 520. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
f34
6f2
Core
Prescott
Allendale
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
1/2
2/2
TDP
84 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8+8 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
1024 kB
Date
2004
June 2007
Mean monothread perf.
7.46k points
7k points
Mean multithread perf.
8.63k points
12.87k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
520
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
1.46k
1.81k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
2.6k
1.81k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.26k
1.79k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.88k
1.16k (x1.32)
TOTAL
6.19k
6.58k (x1.06)

Multithread

520

E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
1.19k
3.62k (x3.04)
Test#2 (FP)
3k
3.61k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.46k
3.59k (x2.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.89k
1.19k (x1.33)
TOTAL
6.54k
12.01k (x1.84)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
520
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
1.96k
2.08k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
3.12k
1.88k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.5k
1.89k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.88k
1.16k (x1.31)
TOTAL
7.46k
7k (x0.94)

Multithread

520

E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
1.77k
4.16k (x2.35)
Test#2 (FP)
4.19k
3.74k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.77k
3.78k (x2.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.89k
1.19k (x1.33)
TOTAL
8.63k
12.87k (x1.49)

Performance/W
520
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
21 points/W
64 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
50 points/W
58 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21 points/W
58 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
11 points/W
18 points/W
TOTAL
103 points/W
198 points/W

Performance/GHz
520
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
700 points/GHz
1155 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1113 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
535 points/GHz
1050 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
315 points/GHz
643 points/GHz
TOTAL
2663 points/GHz
3891 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4