| | | | | | |

Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs Xeon W3550


Description
The Q9550 is based on Core architecture while the W3550 is based on .

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q9550 gets a score of 49 k points while the W3550 gets 73.2 k points.

Summarizing, the W3550 is 1.5 times faster than the Q9550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
106a5
Core
Yorkfield
Bloomfield
Architecture
Core
Base frecuency
2.833 GHz
3.066 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.833 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /4
TDP
95 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128+128 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
12288 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2008
August 2009
Mean monothread perf.
17.29k points
20.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.98k points
73.21k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
Q9550
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
2.6k
2.3k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
6.67k
5.21k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.72k
3.31k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.43k
3.09k (x0.7)
TOTAL
16.42k
13.92k (x0.85)

Multithread

Q9550

W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
9.92k
8.75k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
25.37k
19.8k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.31k
12.38k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.37k
6.17k (x1.83)
TOTAL
48.96k
47.09k (x0.96)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Q9550
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
3.28k
8.34k (x2.54)
Test#2 (FP)
7.28k
5.56k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
3.26k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
3.08k (x0.79)
TOTAL
17.29k
20.24k (x1.17)

Multithread

Q9550

W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
11.72k
32.5k (x2.77)
Test#2 (FP)
24.91k
21.59k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.77k
12.85k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
6.27k (x2.44)
TOTAL
48.98k
73.21k (x1.49)

Performance/W
Q9550
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
123 points/W
250 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
262 points/W
166 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
103 points/W
99 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
27 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
516 points/W
563 points/W

Performance/GHz
Q9550
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
1159 points/GHz
2502 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2568 points/GHz
1669 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/GHz
978 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1375 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
TOTAL
6103 points/GHz
6073 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4